![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3avdhp0DCGx9kPG9myY7V9-nyHUqb-CB7tUZosk3UCMuQF-2qtNt4A_xSjE-R92xjcL4-2O6E5s9JRlpsZmh8uuAw_6AJMwsbAL6wJlOr-QZUWwpbq5TxSOobEOx0bwktA4dogH5fmmY/s200/fat+smoker.jpg)
Both Charile (Munger) and I knew at the time of the Gen Re purchase that it (sub-prime exposure) was a problem and told its management that we wanted to exit the business. It was my responsibility to make sure that happened. Rather than address the situation head-on, however, I wasted several years while we attempted to sell the operation. That was a doomed endeavor, because no realistic solution could have extracted us from the maze of liabilities that was going to exist for decades. So, I failed in my attempt to exit painlessly, and in the meantime more trades were put on the books. Fault me for dithering (what Charile calls thumb-sucking). When a problem exists, whether in personnel or in business operations, the time to act is now.
What could be the reason why “the obvious” does not translate into “actions”? I can think of following:
- Suckers of habit: We are creatures of habit and when it comes to making fundamental changes to our habit (such as “quit smoking” or “managing the business differently”) we are suckers. Most of us don’t have the energy to create “escape velocity” needed to overcome “gravity” of habit and sustain it over long enough period.
- “My baby” syndrome: Many times we would have been part of the creation process, perhaps fathered the business ourselves. Admitting that our kid is sick or perhaps needs a special treatment is like admitting failure in parenting and that hurts. I would rather not admit failure and hope it turns around.
- Friction is painful: Action in situations like these involves confronting with people and that most often results in a lot of friction. Status quo is less friction at least in the short run. And we prefer less friction.
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment