We are all busy solving what appear to each of us to be the important
problems. For example, for some of us, making more money may be the most important thing,
for some others, solving social problems like poverty, inequality, corruption, terrorism,
lack of education and healthcare may be the most important thing. But what if, we are all
solving the wrong problems? What if, we
are all missing the main point? That is the hypothesis I would like to explore
in this article. And I would like to use an analogy mentioned by David Bohm of his
dream involving two cats. Let’s start with the dream.
David Bohm was interviewed by Nobel Laureate Maurice Wilkins for American
Institute of Physics in twelve
sessions over a ten month period from June 6, 1986 to April 16, 1987. In the
interview
session 5 which took place on October 3, 1986, Bohm narrates following dream
which he had during the last phase of his tenure in Princeton in 1950-51:
I was staying in a certain house where they had a cat, and
in this dream, I came into the kitchen, and I saw the cat talking to another
cat, and making a date to meet at a certain time. I said, there must be
something wrong here. I wonder what it is. So I thought about it for a while,
and I said, oh yes. I know (what’s) wrong. Cats can’t tell time. So I
said to the cat, “You cats are not able to tell time.” The cat answered me back
and said, Of course we can tell time. And I said, “Well, look at the clock.
What time is it?” It was about three o’clock. It said, A quarter past eight,
five past nine. So I said, there (you go). That proves that cats can’t tell
time. And then I woke up laughing.
And what did this dream mean, according to Bohm? He says - I
simply took it for granted that cats can talk. And I said, “That’s very
mysterious.” How in the world can they tell time? They don’t have the equipment
for telling time. They never heard of time. So the meaning of the dream was
that something similar must be happening in society, that people are arguing
about small points, and they’re taking for granted some very obvious point that
should be staring us in the face.
So, what Bohm is saying is that when we argue about or try
to solve the problem of whether cats can tell time, we miss the main point. That
is, cats can’t talk. Are we all arguing about “how cats can’t tell time”? We
possibly are. Let me try to illustrate this using one of my recent meetings
with a friend.
I met this friend; let’s call him V, last week. V was
disturbed about the recent appointment of saffron clad firebrand Yogi as the
Chief Minister of the largest state in India. Why should this disturb V?
Because, he feels that events such as this are indicating that India’s secular
image is crumbling and V is concerned. V has tried to convince his friends that
India is heading in the wrong direction. But his friends haven’t bought his
argument. So V is kind of lost. He doesn’t know what to do.
Is V’s argument a kind of “cats can’t tell time” argument? It
is. So what is the main point V is missing? The main point is that the sustained
disturbance in his mind is an indicator that his perception is muddled up. If V
can’t see things clearly, how can he frame the correct problem? Even flights
don’t take off when the visibility is low, in spite of the sophisticated guiding
software.
So the main point is, are you able to see things clearly? Do
you have perceptual clarity? If not, chances are high, you are solving the
wrong problem, no matter how noble the problem is. How do you know if you have
perceptual clarity? Well, every sustained negative emotion, be it anxiety,
stress, anger, blame, guilt, envy, is an indicator that there is lack of perceptual
clarity.
So what should one do? Well, the first step is to recognize that I may be missing the main point every time I am upset. That creates an opening through which intelligence may flow through and it may show us what is going on that is muddling up the perception.
Excellent!
ReplyDeleteThanks RamP.
Delete